MetroGIS Logo: A Common Ground. MetroGIS Logo: Sharing Information Across Boundaries.
   Serving the Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan Area Home   |   Search   |   Contact Us    
 
What is MetroGIS? 
Deliverables & Outcomes 
Business Planning 
What's New 
Major Accomplishments 
Annual Reports 
Affiliations 
Awards 
Grants 
History 

Overview 
Short Quotes 
Testimonials 
Studies 
Performance Measurement 

Overview
Looking for GIS Data or Web Map Services? 
Looking for GIS Applications? 
Looking for GIS Standards/Best Practices? 

Meeting Calendar 
Policy Board 
Coordinating Committee 
Technical Advisory Team 
Special Purpose Workgroups 
Organizational Structure 
Operating Guidelines 
Dissolved Teams 

Presentations 
Major Reports 
Articles & Publications 

 

Benefits > Studies

1998 Numerical Participant Satisfaction Survey Results

Survey Return Rates

Total Surveys Sent

116

Total Surveys Returned

54

Return Rate

46.60%

Survey Return Rates by Committee/Team

Policy Board

36%

Coordinating Committee

87%

Data Access Advisory Team

39%

Data Content Advisory Team

30%

Policy Advisory Team

86%

Standards Advisory Team

73%

Averaged Responses to Questions 1-4
(5 point scale used)
#1. Do you believe your participation is/was an effective use of your time?

Overall Average

3.6

Average by Committee/Team

3.9

Average by Workgroups/Forums

3.7

#2. What is your level of satisfaction with the amount of progress made to accomplish the objectives of MetroGIS?

Overall Average

3.6

Average by Committee/Team

3.7

Average by Workgroups/Forums

3.7

#3. Do you believe organizations that should be informed are adequately apprised of MetroGIS?

Overall Average

3.9

Average by Committee/Team

4.1

Average by Workgroups/Forums

3.8

#4. Are you satisfied with the diversity of stakeholder representation in MetroGIS activities?

Overall Average

4.2

Average by Committee/Team

4.4

Average by Workgroups/Forums

4.3

Question #5 is included in the Comments Section of this report.
#6. How would you rate the quality of leadership (not staff) to the group(s) you served on? (5 point scale)

Policy Board

4.3

Coordinating Committee

4.1

Data Access Advisory Team

4.0

Data Content Advisory Team

3.2

Policy Advisory Team

4.4

Standards Advisory Team

3.8

#7. How do you feel about the Leadership's (not staff) influence on the work of the group(s)? (3 point scale)

Policy Board

2.0

Coordinating Committee

2.1

Data Access Advisory Team

1.7

Data Content Advisory Team

1.7

Policy Advisory Team

2.0

Standards Advisory Team

1.6

Question #8 is included in the Comments Section of this report.

#9. How would you rate the quality of staff support to the Group(s) you served on? (5 point scale)

Policy Board

4.4

Coordinating Committee

4.5

Data Access Advisory Team

4.8

Data Content Team

4.3

Policy Advisory Team

4.4

Standards Advisory Team

4.4

#10. How do you feel about Staff's influence on the work of the group(s) you served on? (3 point scale)

Policy Board

2.0

Coordinating Committee

2.2

Data Access Advisory Team

2.2

Data Content Advisory Team

2.2

Policy Advisory Team

2.1

Standards Advisory Team

2.1

#11. How would you rate the quality and quantity of support materials provided to the group(s) you served on? (5 point scale)

Policy Board

4.1

Coordinating Committee

4.4

Data Access Advisory team

4.1

Data Content Advisory Team

4.1

Policy Advisory Team

4.2

Standards Advisory Team

3.7

Questions 12-15 are included in the Comments Section of this report.

#16. Are you satisfied with the frequency that your group(s) meet? (3 point scale)

Policy Board

4.1

Coordinating Committee

4.4

Data Access Advisory team

4.1

Data Content Advisory Team

4.1

Policy Advisory Team

4.2

Standards Advisory Team

3.7

#17. Are you satisfied with the location and time of your meeting(s)? (5 point scale)

Policy Board

4.0

Coordinating Committee

4.2

Data Access Advisory Team

4.0

Data Content Advisory Team

4.0

Policy Advisory Team

4.1

Standards Advisory Team

4.0

Question #18 is included in the Comments Section of this report.

#19. Do you have access to the MetroGIS website?

Yes

93%

No

7%

19a. Is the design user friendly?
Note: 63% of the survey respondents completed this question
19a and 19b responses have been combined

Excellent

18%

Good

73%

Average

9%

Fair

0

Poor

0

19b. Does it contain useful information?
Note: 62% of the survey respondents completed this question

Excellent

28%

Good

53%

Average

18%

Fair

1%

Poor

0

Question 19c has been included in the Comments Section of this report
#20. Have you read an issue of the MetroGIS Newsletter "Coordinates"?

Yes

72%

No

20%

No response

8%

Is "Coordinates" a useful Communication Tool?

Yes

71%

No

1%

No response

28%

How frequently should it be published?

Quarterly

39%

Semi-Annually

31%

Annually

0

Not Needed

2%

No response

28%

Question 20.(3) is included in the Comments Section of this report.
Questions 21-23 are included in the Comments Section of this report.
   
   Page last updated on April 02, 2002. Home   |   Search   |   Contact Us