MetroGIS Logo: A Common Ground. MetroGIS Logo: Sharing Information Across Boundaries.
   Serving the Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan Area Home   |   Search   |   Contact Us    
 
What is MetroGIS? 
Deliverables & Outcomes 
Business Planning 
What's New 
Major Accomplishments 
Annual Reports 
Affiliations 
Awards 
Grants 
History 

Overview 
Short Quotes 
Testimonials 
Studies 
Performance Measurement 

Overview
Looking for GIS Data or Web Map Services? 
Looking for GIS Applications? 
Looking for GIS Standards/Best Practices? 

Meeting Calendar 
Policy Board 
Coordinating Committee 
Technical Advisory Team 
Special Purpose Workgroups 
Organizational Structure 
Operating Guidelines 
Dissolved Teams 

Presentations 
Major Reports 
Articles & Publications 

 

Dissolved Teams > Data Content Advisory Team

September 11, 1996 Minutes

The meeting began at 1:10 p.m. at the City of St. Louis Park City Hall.

Members present: State: Don Yeager (LMIC); Cities: Chairperson Rick Person (City of St. Paul), Roger Carlson (City of Minneapolis), Judie Erickson (City of St. Louis Park); Private Research: Kent Treichel (Wilder Foundation); Counties: Tim Zimmerman (Hennepin County); Metropolitan: Kathy Johnson (Metropolitan Council), Marcel Jouseau (Metropolitan Council Environmental), Marcia Broman, (Metropolitan 911 Board); Nancy Pollock, (Metropolitan 911 Board); Utilities: Dale Nikkola (Anoka Electric Cooperative).

Members absent: Business Geographics: Joe Ryan (Oppidan Investment Co.); Cities: Maria D'Andrea (City of Robbinsdale); Utilities: Mike Wood (Waypoint Technologies); Public Safety: Mark Tente (Lake Johanna Fire Dept), Dave Schroeder (Police Support LOGIS); Private Consultants: Rebbecca Blue (SEH, Inc.);. Metropolitan: Michael Munson (Metropolitan Council); Academic: Will Craig (UM CURA); Counties: David Claypool (Ramsey County). Jane Harper, (Washington County), John Connelly (St. Paul & Ramsey County Charter Commissions); School Districts: Robert D. Nelson (Richfield Public Schools); State: Tom Eiber (DNR Forestry),

Visitors: Patrick St. John, Metropolitan Council Research Intern

Support Staff: David Vessel, Heidi Welsch

1. Acceptance of the agenda and meeting summary.

The agenda and meeting summary from August 14, 1996 were accepted by consensus.

2. Focus Group Forum

David Vessel explained that two pre-forum meetings were held on August 29 and September 5. A group of volunteers from the Data Content Team including: Rick Person, Roger Carlson, John Connelly, and Will Craig participated in these meetings.

Vessel gave an overview of the process of creating an object model for MetroGIS.

Following the focus groups forum on Thursday, September 19, a JDA session will be conducted on October 30-31. JDA is a technique developed by the consultant (Advanced Strategies, Inc.) to aid consensual decision making. Two representatives from each of the 6 September 19 focus groups will attend the JDA session. This session will culminate in a final object model. The final object model will then go to a data modeling process.The data modeling process has not been defined or planned yet. The team agreed that it may be appropriate to reconstitute the Data Content Advisory Team following the JDA session. This will allow new participants to join and original participants to leave the group. Additionally, the Team will re-examine their mission, purpose and goals at this time. It will be important for some original members of the Data Content Team to confirm the final data model.

Vessel described the process and plan for the September 19th forum. It will be object modeling as opposed to data modeling. The session will determine what types of information (objects) are needed instead of the type of data or dataset that are needed. For example, roads is an object whose location may be needed by many people their job function. There may be particular characteristics of the roads in which they are interested. For example, the location of the center of the road; the width of the road; the interceptors of the road; location of bus stops; etc may be important to a specific job function. Roads is the object and bus stops, etc. associated with the road are the characteristics to be identified for informational needs. "Centerlines," by contrast is a data type and as such will not be recorded on the object model. Both Vessel and Chairperson Person, reflecting on the pre-forum meetings, expressed confidence in the process and the consultants.

Vessel explained the schedule planned for the forum. Training for the Data Analysts and Recording Analysts and Facilitators will occur in the morning. Participants will arrive at noon and a joint group overview will be conducted by Richard Branton (ASI). The participants will break into the six focus groups where they will identify important objects and select 2 or 3 members to represent the focus group in the next stages of the data modeling process. Finally, a joint group wrap-up session will be conducted.

Nancy Pollock asked what participants will be required to prepare. Vessel and Person explained that the consultant prefers no specific preparation by the participants. Participants have been selected on the basis of their knowledge and professional expertise; the sessions will be brainstorming.

There was some concern that if the groups begin prioritizing information needs, important thoughts may be lost. Vessel explained that no information will be lost. Long lists will be created and carried through to the next step of the process.

The team agreed that the next meeting of the Data Content Team should be used to critique the forum and to review any compilation work which has been completed by that date.

3. Next Meeting

The next meeting of the Data Content Team will be October 9, 1996 at 1:00 PM at Hennepin County Offices.

The meeting adjourned at 2:10 p.m.

Prepared by Heidi Welsch, GIS Administrative Intern

   
   Page last updated on April 10, 2002. Home   |   Search   |   Contact Us