MetroGIS Logo: A Common Ground. MetroGIS Logo: Sharing Information Across Boundaries.
   Serving the Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan Area Home   |   Search   |   Contact Us    
 
What is MetroGIS? 
Deliverables & Outcomes 
Business Planning 
What's New 
Major Accomplishments 
Annual Reports 
Affiliations 
Awards 
Grants 
History 

Overview 
Short Quotes 
Testimonials 
Studies 
Performance Measurement 

Overview
Looking for GIS Data or Web Map Services? 
Looking for GIS Applications? 
Looking for GIS Standards/Best Practices? 

Meeting Calendar 
Policy Board 
Coordinating Committee 
Technical Advisory Team 
Special Purpose Workgroups 
Organizational Structure 
Operating Guidelines
Dissolved Teams
Major Projects

Presentations 
Major Reports 
Articles & Publications 
Glossary

 

Dissolved Teams > Policy Advisory Team

February 6, 1997 Minutes

1. Call to Order

Chairperson LaBau called the meeting to order at 8:40 AM. at the Roseville City Hall.

Members Present: Margo LaBau; David Arbeit; Dennis Welsch; Richard Johnson.

Members Absent: Virginia Erdahl; Pat O'Connor Support Staff: Randall Johnson; Heidi Welsch

2.-3. Acceptance of the Agenda and Meeting Summaries

The agenda and meeting summary from December 5, 1996, were accepted as presented by consensus.

4. Report from the Team Chair -- January 15, 1997 MetroGIS Policy Board Meeting

No re-cap of the Board meeting was necessary since all members of the Policy Advisory Team were present for the January 15, 1997, board meeting. Chairperson LaBau reported Dennis Berg, Anoka County's representative to the Board, was impressed with the poster session and very positive about the MetroGIS initiative. Margo noted that he had placed MetroGIS on two County Board committee agendas and stated that he was impressed with the cooperation and coordination that he is witnessing among staff. Margo also noted that notwithstanding his positive feedback Mr. Berg is still concerned about private sector involvement in the process. It was agreed that the private sector's role in the process needs to be among the first matters discussed by the Board.

5. New Business

5a. Policy Board Operating Guidelines

The Team reviewed draft Policy Board Operating Guidelines, dated January 25th, and agreed on several revisions to Articles I (Definitions), II (Policy Board guidelines), and III (Coordinating Committee guidelines). It was agreed that the Operating Guidelines should stipulate that a role of the Policy Board is to endorse guidelines for the organizations/perspectives to be represented on the Board and on the Coordinating Committee and that the appointment of the person to representatives these interests will remain the responsibility of the organization to be represented. Staff was directed to prepare a report for the March 25th Policy Board meeting explaining why a representative was sought from each of the organizations currently represented on the Coordinating Committee and on the Board.

The Team raised questions regarding quorum requirements and the number of Board member votes that should be required to pass a motion. Staff was directed to review the Metropolitan Radio Board's quorum and voting policies and to revise the Board's draft guidelines according for discussion by the Team. The Team agreed that it should review the revised draft of the guidelines as a Team before the March 6th Coordinating Committee meeting. It was also agreed that the following items should be on the Board's March 25th agenda: 1) Articles I (Definitions) and II (Policy Board Guidelines should be presented for discussion and approval, 2) direction should be sought from the Board on several matters concerning guidelines for the Coordinating Committee [items 1a-d on the first page of the staff report for this item], and 3) the Coordinating Committee's adopted interim operating guidelines should be an information item.

The Team discussed the procedure options for moving forward on the guidelines. There was some discussion of whether a sub-group of the Board should be invited to participate in drafting the Operating Guidelines. The Team concurred that the Policy Advisory Team and Coordinating Committee review processes should be relied upon because it would be difficult for the Board to appoint a sub-group to work on this important issue without having more familiarity with the interests and strengths of the individual Board members.

6. Next Meeting

The Team agreed to hold a special meeting before the March 6, 1997 Coordinating Committee meeting to finish its review of the Policy Board Operating Guidelines and to consider the items that were not addressed in the February 6th agenda (Legitimization of the Policy Board; Meeting Notification Guidelines; MetroGIS Newsletter; March 25 Policy Board Agenda).

The special meeting was scheduled as follows: Date: Thursday, 27 February 1997 Time: 8:30 AM. - 10:30 AM. Location: Roseville City Hall

Prepared by Heidi Welsch, GIS Administrative Intern

   
   Page last updated on April 10, 2002. Home   |   Search   |   Contact Us